If you have new customers needing to move from a peer-to-peer workgroup to their first server then the coming 6 – 12 months will be difficult, get SBS 2003 now and swing to SBS 2008 a year from now…or just wait? That’s a hard one to answer, one that will require analysis with each respective client; however, if they need a solution now then you should consider SBS 2003 with SA.
Everyone has heard, SBS 2008 is going to be more expensive, right? So your first thought, even if the customer is not going to deploy the server in the next six months, I should move on SBS 2003 adding SA to lock in the pricing. Well if you look at the pricing of SBS 2003 with SA compared to the new pricing without SA it’s about a wash.
Example (currently):
Ten-user environment
SBS Standard 2003 with 5 included cals along with SA is $781.
SBS client 5 pack along with SA is $690
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/howtobuy/pricing.mspx
Total: $1,471
Example (Future):
SBS 2008 Standard with 5 included cals NO SA $1,089
SBS 2008 Standard 5 pack NO SA $385
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver/essential/sbs/pricing.mspx
Total: $1,474
The question for the client, are the additional benefits included with SA worth buying now when they won’t be using them until 6 – 12 months from now, if at all. The other unknown is what will the pricing for SBS 2008 with SA be? Is it not published because it’s too early or because there won’t be SBS 2013?
The biggest issue for clients on the initial release of SBS 2008 Standard is if they’re running LOB apps will these LOB apps be 64-bit compliant.
For example, the QuickBooks 2008 database server component currently doesn’t list Windows Server 2008 and doesn’t mention whether it works in a 64-bit environment, Susan have you tested this?
http://quickbooks.intuit.com/product/accounting-software/small-business-accounting-software.jsp?view=sysreqs#tabAnchor
We have customers running other similar programs requiring a server based licensing and database module; PeachTree, Master Builder and more.
Other’s have proposed that SBS 2008 should be dead on arrival, http://www.vladville.com/2008/05/not-singing-with-the-choir-in-2008.html. I agree entirely with the comment about the low-end client and the budget crunch, specifically in today’s economy. We’re seeing these low-end clients saying no to much needed basic infrastructure like desktops! I’m OK with running this 6 or 7 year old desktop as our primary business machine, WOW! To the other degree the slightly larger business who likes to stay up on things, having to wait almost two years to get Exchange 2007 because they’re locked into Exchange 2003 on their SBS box. The same is true for the other components i.e. SharePoint and more.
As I’m typing this, I’m seeing Vlad’s argument much clearer, maybe SBS is dying a slow death. Moving a small business client to Server 2008 with hosted exchange services provides a lot more flexibility.
The pricing for Server 2008 is affordable; $999 and $199 for the 5 pack of cals.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/pricing.aspx
Hosted Exchange is getting less expensive, bigger mailboxes and with good vendors more reliable.
As more and more apps move to the cloud the dependence on the local server will be less and less outside of a file and print receptacle.